Duke Center for Firearms Law
Duke Law logo

About Darrell Miller

Center Faculty Co-Director and Melvin G. Shimm Professor of Law. Miler writes and teaches in the areas of civil rights, constitutional law, civil procedure, state and local government law, and legal history. His scholarship on the Second and Thirteenth Amendments has been published in leading law reviews and has been cited by the Supreme Court of the United States, the United States Courts of Appeals, the United States District Courts, and in congressional testimony and legal briefs. With Joseph Blocher, he’s the author of The Positive Second Amendment: Rights, Regulation, and the Future of Heller (Cambridge University Press, 2018).

Written by Darrell Miller

Bostock, Textualism and the Meaning of “Bear Arms”

Posted by on June 23, 2020

This week, in Bostock v. Clayton County, the Supreme Court held 6-3 that discrimination “because of sex” in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 includes discrimination against gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender persons.  The decision was a huge victory for LGBTQ equality, but I want to discuss its implications for Second Amendment […]

When Stand Your Ground Meets Blue Lives Matter

Posted by on May 22, 2020

What happens when the person you “stand your ground” against turns out to be a police officer trying to do his job? On August 20, 2015, John Derossett engaged in a forty-round gunfight with plainclothes deputies of the Brevard Sheriff’s Office.  They were attempting to arrest Derossett’s adult niece for prostitution following an undercover sting […]

Do Local Governments Have Second Amendment Rights?

Posted by and on May 13, 2020

The city is an increasingly common site of contestation for the right to keep and bear arms. Historically, much of gun regulation has been local, such as laws preventing the carrying of firearms into courthouses and schools or requiring that individuals obtain a license or provide a particular reason to carry a weapon.  As a […]

Colloquium on Localism, Popular Constitutionalism, Preemption, and Firearms

Posted by on May 4, 2020

At the end of April, the Center for Firearms Law was delighted to host a colloquium on the topic of Localism, Popular Constitutionalism, Preemption, and Firearms.   Veterans of state and local government law and constitutional law,  as well as new voices, all convened (via Zoom) for a wide-ranging discussion on the intersections between local regulation, […]

McGinnis and the Dubitante Opinion

Posted by on April 28, 2020

Last week Jake highlighted this Fifth Circuit opinion, United States v. McGinnis, in which Eric McGinnis raised a Second Amendment defense to his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) for possession of a firearm while subject to a domestic violence protective order.  Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan applied the two-part framework for Second Amendment challenges that […]

Incidental Burdens in a Pandemic

Posted by on April 6, 2020

Nationwide, state and local officials have issued emergency orders closing vast sectors of the economy in order to prevent the spread of coronavirus.  Gun rights advocates have responded with lawsuits claiming, inter alia, that the Second Amendment exempts them from these orders.  Their argument, in essence, is that the right to keep and bear arms […]

Gunpowder, Plague, and Tradition

Posted by on April 2, 2020

In 1720, writer and self-designated medical expert Joseph Browne published his A Practical Treatise of the Plague, in which he extolled the benefits of the “firing of Guns, especially Cannon” to “purify” an atmosphere laden with pestilence.  In recommending this approach, Browne had significant company.  It appears that igniting gunpowder had been the folk medicine […]

Equilibrium Adjustment and Second Amendment Doctrine

Posted by on January 28, 2020

Almost a decade ago, Professor Orin Kerr wrote a brilliant article called “An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment.”  In it, he posited a theory of the Fourth Amendment that describes judges applying Fourth Amendment doctrine so as to maintain some equilibrium between police power and personal liberty.   As he writes: When changing technology or […]

More on Text, History, and Tradition and NYSRPA

Posted by on December 18, 2019

Much of the oral argument in NYSRPA v. New York City dealt with mootness: whether there was even a case or controversy before the court, as required by Article III of the United States Constitution.   But someday, whether in NYSRPA or some other case, the Court will have to address the question of which method […]

The Anti-Carolene Court and Gun Politics

Posted by on November 22, 2019

Nicholas Stephanopoulos has recently posted an article describing how the Roberts Court is fast becoming the “Anti-Carolene Court.”   The 1938 case United States v. Carolene Products Co. is famous, of course, for its footnote four, where Justice Stone articulates a theory of judicial review keyed to the need for judicial officers to intervene when there’s […]